Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat and Dog (comic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cat and Dog (comic)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable comic lacking Ghits and GNEWS. Originating editor removed PROD. ttonyb (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This seems to be either a joke or some kid's (unpublished) comic strip. Not verifiable, no encyclopedic value. --Glenfarclas (talk) 11:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Polarpanda (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, maybe even Speedy delete. I couldn't find any sources for this, seems like it was just made up DRosin (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete either a hoax or profoundly non-notable. The article doesn't even bother to tell us what sort of "comic" this is... comic book? newspaper strip? webcomic? The name of the author gets just one Google hit, an obituary of a relative, and even that might just be someone else with the same name. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article and creator's user page User:Tigermyboo suggests this is a home-made comic about the family cat and dog, which isn't really encyclopedia material. Best of luck with it though. Sharksaredangerous (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:MADEUP or WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 23:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ^^^. JBsupreme (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think Joe Chill said it perfectly. Either it was made up, or it doesn't meet our notability guidelines. Either way, delete. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.