Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castlevania Next-Gen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Castlevania Next-Gen[edit]

No title, no logo, no screenshot, no sources. Surely not worthy of an article yet? Oscarthecat (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fuzzy camera images and bad fanart are not "sources", and it's incredibly likely there will be a better title for this game when it does come out. Nate • (chatter) 09:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SOURCES, SCREEN SHOTS, LOGO, REFERENCES, TRAILER...ALL ON ARTICLE NOW! PLEASE LOOK AT ARTICLE BEFORE DELETING. --(User talk:Grantsaylor1995) 12:55, 6 June 2009
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any reliable information about the game. It was briefly announced on TGS '08^[1] ... and that's about it. The publisher didn't even mention it on this year's E3 when they made another announcement about another Castlevania game being developed by an entirely different developing team.^[2] — Rankiri (talk) 15:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – unlike the other games that have been announced at E3 and have already had significant press coverage and coverage everywhere on the globe, what is currently presented about this new game is pure speculation by the given sources. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, Grantsaylor1995, please do not top-post or shout. MuZemike 23:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 23:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & Merge A mention + link in the/a Castlevania article is all this seems to be worth, if anything. There simply isn't enough available to merit an article.--Koji† 23:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and above. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 00:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, maybe if people helped edit the article or merge it.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.33.76 (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It may be more appropriate to userfy the page, work on it there until deemed suitable as a wikipedia article, and then canvas some editors for opinion on whether it's now ready. Doubtless once more information is released an article for this game will be needed, but just seems a little early right now. --Oscarthecat (talk) 07:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, from the article: "very little is known about this game...". Need I say more? --Taelus (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.