Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassandra starr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to draftspace. (non-admin closure) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cassandra Starr[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A stub with no good references (independent, reliable, significant, etc.). A Google search reveals no reliable coverage to indicate notability. William2001^(talk) 04:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. William2001^(talk) 04:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. William2001^(talk) 04:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft perhaps. Role in a major upcoming film. News might be made. Hyperbolick (talk) 19:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft for now - It seems WP:TOOSOON, as she has not had any significant coverage so far. She does have the potential to garner more, though, as she has roles in upcoming major films, though she does not appear to be a major character in either. Returning it to draft for now, with the potential to expand and return to article space in the future if more coverage becomes available, seems like the best choice. Rorshacma (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.