Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassandra Hall Rawlins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of The Young and the Restless characters (1980s). Consensus is that the notability guideline is not met, so the page should remain a redirect. Davewild (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cassandra Hall Rawlins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a character from a soap opera. A post at the help desk advised of an edit war, which I quelled by protecting the title rather than blocking multiple editors for 3RR. The war was over whether this should be a stand-alone article or a redirect to List of The Young and the Restless characters (1980s). I have now searched for sources using Google Books and a News Archive, and found enough to verify a sentence or two but little else and not enough for notability, so I have taken this here seeking to determine whether this should remain a redirect or not so that further reversions are not just one side warring with another but are measured and actionable against consensus. Based on the lack of reliable sources I found, I think it should remain a redirect unless other evidence is provided. Because at the time of protection it was a redirect, you will need to look at the page history to see the content from past versions, e.g., this one (this is not, however, an RfD issue at heart which is why I've brought it here). If anyone thinks they can establish notability and wishes to edit, I will lift the protection but given the warring that was going on, I will leave it protected for the moment. I will inform everyone involved in the reversions and provide a link at the help desk post.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect – Redirect it into the 1980s article. There is not enough sourced content for the character to warrant her own character page. There are current characters on the series that don't even warrant their own page per WP:SOAPS, WP:V and WP:NOTABILITY. There is no way this page will warrant anything other than a short description on the 1980s page, especially by an actress, whom by herself, fails to be large enough to be apart of the series. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 05:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Agree with User:Musicfreak7676 Athleek123 05:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per User:Musicfreak7676. Shark96z (talk · contribs) 07:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.