Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cass Lewart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. His notability does not expire, but there's scant evidence that he ever was notable. StarM 23:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cass Lewart[edit]

Subject generates no significant hits, his books (mostly textbooks) are all out of print and seem to have made little impact. I can't find a memoir anywhere. In short, this person is not notable. Drmies (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 04:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Concur with statement that the people fails the notability requirements. Lack of verifiable sources is also a major issue. ThePointblank (talk) 05:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless third party sources can be found. Ancemy (talk) 00:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a reference (a review of one of his books). If his books are out of print, this does not detract from notability: notability does not expire. Some but not all his books can be found at http://catalog.loc.gov -- Eastmain (talk) 00:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of third party sources. The above review appears to be from a self-published source and is not enough. --neon white talk 01:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Needs more to be kept. The only reference is pretty marginal. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, and Neon white ~Pip 2 andahalf 06:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet the GNG. RMHED (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.