Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Krehbiel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Krehbiel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this subject fails WP:NBLP. The three sources shown only list the subject's name in a trivial mention of the producers of 'Nightshade', which would not meet WP:SIGCOV. Searches only come up with the producer on review sites and other social media pages. Karnataka (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, Television, and United States of America. Karnataka (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. He has other good sources I can also include. Could you please give me a little more time? I will add more citations where he is also mentioned. Ricktheelectric (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Adding more sources to prove the notability of the subject is wonderful! Karnataka (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also from what I know Deadline is considered to be a reliable source of information and only notable filmmakers are mentioned there and this man is also in the Hollywood Reporter which I also included in his references section. Ricktheelectric (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricktheelectric: I have no problem with the source itself, Deadline and Hollywood Reporter may be very reliable and notable, however adding "more citations where he is also mentioned" will not prove the notability of Casy Krehbiel (read WP:SIGCOV by following this link). In all three sources, he is only mentioned once, and there is no further information about him other than that he was one of the co-producers of 'Nightshade'. Karnataka (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so are you saying that I need more sources where there is detailed information about him, such as an interview? Ricktheelectric (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricktheelectric an interview, regardless of who publishes it will not pass WP:GNG due to it not being independent of the subject. Find sources that comply with this, such as articles that not just mention Krehbiel's name, but those that also talk about himself, his expertise, his past life or his career and add them into the article. Read Wikipedia:BLP as it offers guidance of how biographies should be written and sourced. Karnataka (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine then in that case I will find more sources such as detailed articles about Krehbiel but in the meantime I think that the solution is to improve this page and not delete it. It still fulfills the Wikipedia guidelines on notability as well as use of reliable sources. Ricktheelectric (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Since the article was created today, I'll wait a few days before giving a vote. In its current form, the article reads like a resume listing every episode of every show the subject worked on. The two sources on the article are the same two that come up in a Google search[1]. From what I can find, I don't see anything to substantiate GNG (GNG is only a bare minimum threshold for presumption, not proving the subject is notable) and beyond that I can't think of an argument to make that the subject is notable. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 21:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I ran a google search on him, yes was able to see he some film credited to his name, but no good source found to establish his notability.Epcc12345 (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly a non-notable light reality show producer. The rest of the bio is just non-notable Redbox/Tubi filler, and uncredited extra work doesn't push this above NACTOR. Nate • (chatter) 01:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.