Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carshalton Village F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Carshalton Village F.C.[edit]
Non-notable Sunday league football team that plays in a non-notable league (the Morden and District League). Agreed policy in WP:CORP is that only teams in levels 1-10 of the English football league system are inherently notable but the league they play in isn't even part of the system, let alone in the top ten levels. Qwghlm 16:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Qwghlm 16:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. BlueValour 17:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. к1иgf1$н£я5ω1fт 17:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom/WP:CORP. – Elisson • T • C • 18:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Considered maybe it has an association to someone notiable that would warrant this article as support for that. Manager, Chairman - redlinks, formed by - not linked, none of these make it notiable. Looking at the mentioned players 6 linked to articles, Allen manager of another club, Russell dab page no footballers, mitchell dab page only one footballer deceased 1996, baker lives in Houston texas no mention of commuting to play, Easton footballer stub article but says he is playing in another league, Gordon lives in Sonoran Desert another long commute. Gnangarra 02:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sorry but non-notable, even if they do have a ground that holds nearly 2000 fans, which would seem unlikely at that level..... ChrisTheDude 08:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails established criteria by a long way. AFD template has been removed from the article, so I've reinstated it. - fchd 12:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.