Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carpathianism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Nicolae Carpathia. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carpathianism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consists entirely of in-universe plot material, and fails the general notability guideline. No evidence that this has been covered by any reliable, third-party sources. *** Crotalus *** 20:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the Nicolae Carpathia character's article. While Carpathianism may be an important part of the books' universe, it does not meet WP:GNG on its own merit. I'll go ahead and add a better-written Carpathianism section to the character's article. --Sarasco (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Sarasco. Why are we even here? Was a merge or redirect even attempted (per WP:ATD before this AfD was opened? Jclemens (talk) 15:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge due to absence of third-party sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.