Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn B. Przekurat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carolyn B. Przekurat[edit]

Carolyn B. Przekurat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was able to find her husband's family paid for biography in a local Albaqueque News paper, and her sisters paid for obituary in the Deseret News in Salt Lake City. From that I learned her maiden name is Bjorkman, and she evidently usaully goes by Carrie. I did find a directory listing calling Carolun Przekurat a New Mexico licensed dietician. There is this article [1] on nutrician services for alcohol/substance abuse clients that has Carolyn Przekurat as 6 listed of 8 authors. Here [2] we find her on a list of 101 confirmed public health service people, with the postion of dietician director. At best we have one source that might pass the GNG, although I would have to do some other searches to find the LDS Church news source to assess things like how large it is, but even if we assume it adds towards GNG, GNG requires multiple sources which we lack. Everything else is even less clearly a reliable source, or just a directory listing. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I find a small amount of passing coverage in newspapers.com, but nothing in depth. She seems to have an entry in: Who's Who in the West, 25th edition, 1996-1997. Marquis. New Providence, NJ, but I do not have access to that and am not sure it would establish notability. I don't see anything in other databases (Genealogybank, google services) Looking at other versions of her name, I also see some results for a Carol, but not clearly the same person and nothing in depth. Here is a link to the LDS page which is broken to me in the article: http://web.archive.org/web/20160304220923/http://www.ldschurchnewsarchive.com/articles/24048/Dietician-named-to-top-post.html. I am commenting rather than giving a !vote because the position of chief dietitian officer is a fairly significant post (you can get an idea of the org chart looking at: https://www.usphs.gov/aboutus/leadership.aspx) and might even satisfy WP:NPOL #1 and WP:POLOUTCOMES bullet point 1, but I can't tell. Otherwise, I'd !vote weak delete. Smmurphy(Talk) 22:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. There's very little out there about her and she does not satisfy NPOL #1. A "chief dietician officer" is a technical advisor, not a legislator. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.