Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Schlossberg (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Schlossberg (disambiguation)[edit]

Dab page with only one entry. Conversion to a redirect has been reverted by the creator without explanation. Either delete or redirect. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's no such thing as disambiguating between only one entry. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Most readers know Caroline Kennedy is Caroline Schlossberg. Are there any other Caroline Schlossbergs who are notable? I'm frankly doubtful here. Artene50 (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Most readers know Caroline Kennedy is Caroline Schlossberg." They do? Do you have evidence of this? Axl (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter whether or not most readers know that; when the same person is known by two different names, a simple redirect is usually enough to assist readers. Disambiguation pages are needed only when at least two persons (things, places, etc.) are known by the same name. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 12:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doubtful that a redirect of Caroline Schlossberg is even necessary though redirects are cheap and there's generally little reason to object to them. Disambiguation pages, on the other hand, should only exist when there are things to disambiguate. --Dhartung | Talk 04:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: This page should just be redirected. If the user continues to revert it just ask an admin to intervene. – Jerry^teps 04:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Forgot that is was a disambiguation. o_0 The page should be deleted. I added a redirect for Caroline Schlossberg. There are no other notable Caroline Schlossberg's so why make a disambiguation for it? When this is deleted someone will need to fix the disambiguation link up the top of Caroline Schlossberg. – Jerry^teps 04:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've already removed that disambiguation link on the Caroline Kennedy page, because we don't know of any other Caroline Schlossberg that anybody might be looking for. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pointless disambiguation. Incidentally, the main article uses the name "Schlossberg" throughout the article. The title of the article should be consistent with the name used in the article's content. Axl (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There isn't even one "Caroline Schlossberg". Caroline Kennedy has repeatedly stated that she never changed her name. Please see the talk page for her article where I've linked to the Larry King interview and the Time magazine interview where she says she kept her own name. Ariadne55 (talk) 19:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, already! Just Redirect It! Eddie.willers (talk) 02:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.