Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Scheufele

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Scheufele[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about non notable jewelry executive. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland -related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It may be promotional, but that does not mean it is unnotable, as she has been the subject of several other articles in reliable sources: [1] [2] In addition, she seems to have won an award from a well known organization: [3] Jinkinson talk to me 16:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:23, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep That's not at all what I was expecting from a promotional article. Profiles in the Telegraph and FT? Neonchameleon (talk) 21:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has sufficient coverage in reliable, high quality sources as pointed out above. Mabalu (talk) 13:19, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.