Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Plumb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was After doing some googling and finding the special issue of Management Today, keep. RasputinAXP c 13:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Plumb[edit]

Non notable, fails WP:BIO. Also, I want to mention that the creator of the page, Charlieosmond (talk · contribs), appears to be Charlie Osmond, co-funder of FreshMinds with her [1], thus I believe it can also be considered vanity. ReyBrujo 04:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject of the article has non personal business related notability as described on the page. I edited the page to remove what looked like excessive advertisement of the aforementioned company. May have been vanity. But with the recognition and editing of other editors can easily be made NPOV. Ans e ll 11:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep She is sort of notable as written in the article. —M e ts501^talk 12:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails independent sources test, fails autobiography test, fails notability test Crum375 21:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep sounds notable enough. Needs some cleanup though. Buchanan-H e rmit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 02:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP, part of a walled garden. Stifle (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Ansell. -- DS1953 ^talk 04:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.