Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Edelstam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 3 "keep" !votes but one is a "per nom" and the other is in Swedish and the google translation of it is not a "keep" rationale. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Edelstam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable.There are three references. One of them is a report that some grandchildren of Harald Edelstam had been introduced to the president of Chile in honour of Harald Edelstam - there is no suggestion in that article that Caroline Edelstam Molin has nay notability in her own right. Another reference is an announcement by AMREF that she had been appointed to a post by them. The other one is a very brief mention of the same appointment, which actually refers to the organisation she was appointed by as "the almost unknown organization AMREF Flying Doctors". Nothing at all indicates notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seem to have had some success for herself. References exist. I say Keep.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Molin förlita sig på sin egen kreativitet och övertalningsförmåga och organisationen har därför lyckats --MoonLichen (talk) 03:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Care to translate that? While sources don't have to be in English, a comment in an AfD should be if you want it to have any practical effect within the decision. LadyofShalott 00:51, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Babba. –SJ + 18:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.