Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Doty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Caroline Doty[edit]
- Caroline Doty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails sports guidelines by not having played for the pros, and fails GNG as well. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Actually, she passes GNG. Plenty of third party, independent news coverage, plus she plays for the greatest women's college basketball team in NCAA history (and by plays I mean she actually gets significant minutes, she's not just the sixth substitute off of the bench). Article needs lots of cleanup and expansion, but the basic stub is definitely notable. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is about an athlete who fails sports guidelines. Xajaso (talk) 22:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep:per Jrcla2 - Ret.Prof (talk) 02:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - also per Jrcla2.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.