Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Connors (pornographic actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Connors (pornographic actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet any of the four WP:PORNBIO criteria, as she has not won a well-known award; has not received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years; has not made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre; and has not been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. NW (Talk) 22:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 05:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Prior AfD Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: One of the name porn actresses of the 70s, never mind PORNBIO; she meets C1 and C2 of WP:ENTERTAINER. Ravenswing 16:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the aforementioned reasons + she's the mother of actress Thora Birch. -- fdewaele, 4 January 2011, 19:12 CET
Keep Conners was the title character in both the Erotic Adventures of Candy and Candy Goes to Hollywood, as well as the nurse in Deep Throat, by some measures the most profitable film of all time. Should keep for her appearances on US national on The Gong Show. K8 fan (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The reasons given are exactly WHY this artist should be retained. Minutiae is a forte of Wikipedia and giving that up just because a person isn't significant enough, when the article IS informative, hurts all users, a little at a time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.205.167 (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While PORNBIO notability may be dubious, meets both WP:ENT and the GNG through her association with Chuck Barris and Thora Birch. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.