Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Berz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Berz[edit]

Carol Berz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable only as a city councillor, not reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to make her more special than the norm. As always, city councillors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- to make it in the door, a city councillor must either (a) serve in a city that is externally recognized as having global city status, or (b) show a range of nationalizing coverage to demonstrate that they're much more prominent than most other city councillors. But there are just five footnotes here, of which two are primary source "staff" profiles which are not support for notability, and the other three are just routine local election coverage in Chattanooga's local media, which is not enough to demonstrate that she's special since every city councillor can always show three hits of "Councillor wins ward" or "councillor announces campaign for ward" in their own local media. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced considerably better than this. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NOTABLE. ~Cupper (talk) 19:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete city council women in a city this size are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N.Mayoticks (talk) 13:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, limited coverage in local news, no national press Spudlace (talk) 01:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.