Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmine Guerriero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carmine Guerriero[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's pretty clear that WP:BIO is not met and I don't believe that WP:PROF is met either. PROF 8 is the only possible criteria which could be relevant, but since the journal was only founded last year, it seems unlikely that it is "a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area." SmartSE (talk) 18:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It does appear that Guerriero holds a named professorship, although it is less than clear that this is the type that actually passes that possible notability prong.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As far as I can tell the Rita Levi Montalcini program that is funding his chair is a government program for young researchers, not the charitable endowment typically associated with such positions, so I don't think the WP:PROF criteria is met. - MrOllie (talk) 14:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on GS the subject does not pass WP:PROF#1. Also associate profs dont fall under NPROF#5. --hroest 18:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citation record not good enough for WP:PROF#C1, named but lower-rank job title not good enough for #C5, nothing else evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.