Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Craig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carly Craig[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article claims "best known for starring in Role Models and Hall Pass; based on the WP articles, tho she's a named character with a role in the plot, she's very far from "starring in" and nothing else here is more than trivial. DGG ( talk ) 19:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably delete for now as although my searches found a few results here and there (Books and browser) there wasn't anything convincingly good and her IMDb summarizes it well that there's not enough for a better article at this time. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've added a couple of references to the article. I would give the subject the benefit of the doubt as to notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per above comment. More discussion would help. Courcelles (talk) 21:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 21:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems to have enough credits and sources and no glaring issues. JesseRafe (talk) 21:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think the coverage she has received so far is enough to guarantee an article here. Meets WP:GNG.--Skr15081997 (talk) 03:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - her biggest exposure (pardon the pun) has been modeling for Esquire -- I don't see reviews of her acting. Bearian (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.