Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlton World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carlton World[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This channel, similarly to Carlton Kids, has NOT been tagged with sources for over 10+ years. Just like Carlton Kids, I do not believe this channel is notable enough to have its own page. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm disappointed that we are having to have this conversation again. The article does contain suitable references and just because the channel was only on air for a relatively short time does not mean that it is not notable. Rillington (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I would tend to agree length of time on air should not be a factor in whether or not the article is deleted. Moreover as this was part of the UK's move into digital broadcasting there is an argument that there is historical importance. However an alternative might be to have one article covering all the digital channels Carlton set up and which folded in the early 2000s. Dunarc (talk) 23:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.