Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlton Players, Birkenhead (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carlton Players, Birkenhead[edit]

Not notable little theater group, article does not show independent third party notability and reads like a press release β^_command 12:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Amalthea^Talk 00:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Citations from reliable sources are required by the verifiability policy but don't appear to be present. Stifle (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without WP:RS. Otherwise it reads like an essay anyway so needs tagging. WikiScrubber (talk) 17:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.