Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Petroni (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Petroni[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like a piece of self-promotion by a person of doubtful notability. The article did survive a deletion discussion a few years ago, but consensus can change. PatGallacher (talk) 01:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sourcing isn't good but his bio strongly suggests notability. Most sourcing will be in Spanish and probably offline due to the age, but there are English sources from his time in San Francisco: SF Gate (multiple articles), Democracy for All ("leader of the immigrant rights movement"). Here are some recent Argentinian news sources via Google Translate: [1][2][3][4][5]. -- GreenC 21:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 08:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per sources discovered by Green Cardamom and his long career in politics in several countries. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
keep but BLP stub It's clear that this guy has some degree of notability. The current uncited and practically first-person-reported state is unacceptable, however, and it needs to be stubbed until it has real sources. Mangoe (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.