Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Macedo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Carlos Macedo[edit]
- Carlos Macedo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable secondary coverage of this source that I can find. Several wikimirrors ( hint: [1] is a wikimirror) a few listings from the encyclopedia portion of ANN ), and the passing mention I added to the article. Language difficulties are always a potential roadblock, additional sources welcomed as always. joe deckertalk to me 00:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this BLP. J04n(talk page) 10:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Comte0 (talk) 23:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are indeed lots of Carlos Macedo on the internet. The Portuguese article say he is a member of a theatre company. A google search including that company returns a page from the lisbon town hall cultural agenda, a culture newspaper, the child theatre of Lisbon... Comte0 (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please read and understand WP:RS, WP:GNG and WP:PRIMARY. In my view, pt.wikipedia by itself doesn't meet RS, agendalx and journaldinamo (both of which mention the fellow once each in a cast listing) don't provide "significant coverage" and therefore don't address WP:GNG, and til-tl is WP:PRIMARY and therefore doesn't go to WP:GNG. --joe deckertalk to me 20:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, the theatre link I gave wasn't from pt.wikipedia (that's his company, not a wikipedia article) and I also assumed good faith on the ti-tl link: the fact that they do not cite their sources does not mean there aren't any. Comte0 (talk) 22:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please read and understand WP:RS, WP:GNG and WP:PRIMARY. In my view, pt.wikipedia by itself doesn't meet RS, agendalx and journaldinamo (both of which mention the fellow once each in a cast listing) don't provide "significant coverage" and therefore don't address WP:GNG, and til-tl is WP:PRIMARY and therefore doesn't go to WP:GNG. --joe deckertalk to me 20:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Comte0 (talk) 08:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.