Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos J. Puig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos J. Puig[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO - sources do not establish notability, spammy too though better than it was. ukexpat (talk) 21:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Essentially an advertisement. The presidency of a major professional association is notable; International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery is not a major professional organization, and I am not sure it is even a notable one . DGG ( talk ) 22:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery now also at AFD.--ukexpat (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. I checked, using Bing.com. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this biography of a physician operating in one of the most commercialized areas of medicine. I see plenty of unreliable promotional sources saying that he is wonderful and quite a few unreliable sources saying that he is terrible. But no reliable sources demonstrating notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and as the work of SEOMozinator (talk · contribs), who was indef blocked for undisclosed paid editing. —teb728 t c 10:59, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above. Entry is more of an ad than content. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 20:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not finding relevant sources. Sources cited in the article are mostly not independant, and at least one doesn't say what the article says it says. A google search turns up review websites and ads, a news search turns up unrelated stuff about a baseball player and one press release on this guy, a scholar search should (haven't tried it yet) turn up his papers that he's authored but I doubt anything on him personally, and a book search turns up books he's been a contributing author to, and a court case where he was the defendant; nothing about him. If he's some sort of pioneer in hair restoration or leader in the field I'm just not finding the sources. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The organization he heads does not meet the criteria to make him notable as an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.