Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos E Contreras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-02 08:28Z

Carlos E Contreras[edit]

Non-notable -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 18:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam/CoI (not quite blatant enough for speedy), and delete Ken lorber, TM Systems, TranStation and Deeny Kaplan (see: Deenyk (talk · contribs)) too for the same reasons. Demiurge 19:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Demiurge. Danny Lilithborne 21:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (the other four have already been speed-deleted). The company -- TM Systems -- could possibly have an article, not written like an ad for the company, if it is notable enough; but I frankly haven't seen any signs of it being that notable. (I don't work in the industry, so all I can go on is results from Google). Note that claims that theirs is the leading technical solution, reading very much like an advert and including external links, were inserted in several articles such as Translation process, Dubbing (filmmaking), Subtitle (captioning) and even the Translation category -- assuming good faith here, but it's still spam. As for the founders/employees and the products, no, per Demiurge. --Bonadea 09:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CSD#G11 and so tagged. Would appear to fail WP:RS also. Ohconfucius 08:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.