Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Judie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Judie[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable WP:NACTOR. In a WP:BEFORE search, all I can find on him is blogs and WP:THESUN. Wikishovel (talk) 12:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 12:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Some coverage around his death, but does not seem to have earned critical attention. I can't find anything else about the individual. Oaktree b (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are 3 citations used in this article. It should pass WP:GNG by a small margin. If not, this article can be renamed to Death of Carl Judie, as the citations are somewhat leaning towards his death. There's definitely some more parts of the citations that could be used to strengthen the article somewhat. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the three references you've cited is that they're all blog posts, rather than WP:Reliable sources. A hundred blog references like that still wouldn't demonstrate notability: we're looking for coverage in newspapers, books, films, etc, showing how Judie was notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Wikishovel (talk) 05:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails NACTOR, and I'm not really seeing a case for WP:GNG either.-KH-1 (talk) 02:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and those above. Sources are below the threshold for inclusion. BD2412 T 00:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.