Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Ivan Villafuerte Calayag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 15:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Ivan Villafuerte Calayag[edit]

Carl Ivan Villafuerte Calayag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Only 45k subscribers and not known much outside YouTube. Barely any coverage as far as I can see. scope_creep (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - searches turned up zero to show they even come close to passing WP:GNG.Onel5969 TT me 02:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's notable, in that he is associated with ABS-CBN, both on TV and a large YouTube channel, which is ostensibly very big. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To address the latest !vote
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment How about some actual evidence Jjjjjjdddddd. 45k subscribers is considered extremly low, and at the very bottom of the range and below the WP standard which is around 250k subscribers. scope_creep (talk) 09:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is there no evidence he associated with ABS-CBN. I had a similar case with another vlogger, who was running a YouTube channel, but who was associated with HBO, which was considered notable. scope_creep (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.