Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cargo (2018 film) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cargo (2018 film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the third time an article about the same film has been created. Without being able to see previous versions, it is difficult to know if anything has changed since it was deleted a year ago. In any case, this is a film that received neither acclaim nor much interest from critics. It received no awards and has only a handful of reviews. A non-notable horror film. Bitter Oil (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC) Bitter Oil (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bitter Oil (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The previous deletions were for versions of the article from before the film was released. The film now exists and the nominator has given no policy-based reason for deletion. The very fact that Thorsten Quaeschning composed an original soundtrack is as far as I'm concerned automatic notability right there. ‑ Iridescent 21:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should I have included the link to Wikipedia:Notability (films)? This film fails all criteria and doesn't have the significant coverage that would be required to meet general notability guidelines. Bitter Oil (talk) 15:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it does have significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as full reviews in Aint it Cool News and Film Threat (already referenced in the article) which are listed WikiProject Film reliable sources so WP:GNG is passed and there are likely more sources available, also the review in Rue Morgue also seems to be reliable as that is a print magazine with offices in a number of countries and with it's own Wikipedia article, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Does not appear to be notable based on my interpretation of WP:NFILM, but the article cites a fair number of RS, and thus it meets WP:GNG. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 18:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.