Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cards in the hat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn with consensus to keep. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cards in the hat[edit]
- Cards in the hat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a game guide. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 21:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources, how-to guide, et cetera. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Keep per Colonel Warden's sources. That's two more sources than I could have found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep *Sigh*. I have added two sources to demonstrate notability and expect that we could add dozens more if needed. The nomination quite fails to explain why we should not cover this game when we have articles upon thousands of other games, from Acey-deucey to Zoo Tycoon. Why should we discriminate against simple card games? Colonel Warden (talk) 21:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I further note that this article was nominated for deletion less than 10 minutes after its creation. This is disgraceful. AFD is not a race. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:29, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll withdraw as I didn't realize we were allowed to have how to guides for card games, but I'd appreciate if someone could explain to me why we have howtos for card games, but not video games? LegoTech·(t)·(c) 00:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.