Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiak

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 November 17.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 20:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Tagged with {{BLP sources}} since March 2016. DBrown SPS (talk) 11:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It does not show any good reference nor any proof of a real record producer for high-profile artists. 71.15.141.166 (talk) 11:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable promotion. Also made by User:Cardiak100, so this is a WP:AUTOBIO. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.