Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carbon Trade Exchange
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Carbon Trade Exchange[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carbon Trade Exchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was created evading a salting. No real evidence of notability - none of the sources provide in-depth, independent coverage * Pppery * it has begun... 19:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Environment, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP/WP:SIRS. On WP:LIBRARY all available sources are press releases, like those already representing most of the sources in the article. Jfire (talk) 21:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.