Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarDekho (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 07:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CarDekho[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real coverage of this run of the mill website, same as last time around. The citations consist of blogs and weak "news" orgs that "write" articles that are mere paraphrases of announcements and press releases. No real reporting, If the subject weren't touting these "events", nobody would know that they happened because they don't matter outside of this company's tiny fishbowl. They are using Wikipedia for PR. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Spiderone 14:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 23:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Possible notability for parent corporation does not transfer to subsidiary, and the sources available for subsidiary are apparent repackaged PR. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.