Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capital.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A young start-up without significant accomplishments. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. All I find are interviews, trade press, routine announcements, press releases. WP:TOOSOON. Rentier (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I searched under both names for the company and couldn't find anything to satisfy notability requirements. The references used in the article also do not meet the threshold for WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree. scope_creep (talk) 07:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom. Little independent coverage, although there was this article, but I wonder about what criteria World Finance uses to choose companies to feature (company pays fee?). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.