Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capacity Development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by East718. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 • Talk 05:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capacity Development[edit]

The first words of one state of the article said it all "this site is created by United Nations Development Programme". Wikipedia is not a free host. We already have the United Nations Development Programme article. We do not need this. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it appears to be being used as a free host? Fosnez (talk) 10:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, the United Nations must be having some budget problems. Mandsford (talk) 12:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Capacity Development reflects a paradigm shift which is also highlighted in the Paris Declaration (also in wikipedia) - this is a shift that is reflected in all development agencies, not just in UNDP, including but not limited to ADB, the World Bank, AusAID, NZAid, USAID, JICA, KOICA, etc. Heidi.han (talk) 11:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - most if not all of it is a copyvio. Even if not a copyvio, no refs RS to verify notability. Sbowers3 (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: article was in fact speedily deleted as a blatant copyright violation, but has been recreated - also with blatant copyvio. Sbowers3 (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied again for copyvio. Sbowers3 (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the contents on the article are written by those who are creating the article - how to overcome being judged as copyvio? This is a question for clarificationHeidi.han (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC
- Simple - DO NOT copy and paste from anyplace. Don't even copy words that you yourself have written before. Start from the beginning and write in your own words. Secondly, find independent, third-party sources such as newspapers or magazines that have described the subject. After every paragraph you write, add a footnote saying the source of your information. Sbowers3 (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.