Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canvas Prog Hour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. The Land 19:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canvas Prog Hour[edit]

Another vanity article from the Progulus Radio series. --Peta 02:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is in no way a vanity article for Progulus. The Canvas Prog Hour is not even created by Progulus, they simply broadcast it. It seems that you want to delete things just because you have not heard of them. This is not marketing or promotion, these are informational srticles for people interested in this type of music. UniversalMigrator 02:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable radio show. Without proper sources for its claims, there is no verifiable evidence presented that the show is "a globally syndicated program", although by that they probably just mean webcasts. I'm also concerned that the "Stations that play the Canvas Prog Hour" section consists almost entirely of redlinks, and that most of them do not sound like radio stations ("Own Dog's Musical Journey"). How about providing call letters for these alleged stations, and their frequencies? wikipediatrix 03:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The links were red because they don't have Wikipedia articles, that doesn't mean they're not established stations. Most of the stations are webcasts, so I changed the links and labeled the stations as webcasts. Internet stations don't have call letters, so that answers that rediculous question. Furthermore, I don't know if this is what you're thinking, but I'm not involved at all with the production of this show. I felt that there was enough interest in this program, and that it was "notable" enough to have an article on here. The times are changing folks. Something doesn't have to have multiple articles written about it to have notability. Something can acquire notability through its reputation among its target audience. UniversalMigrator 04:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's motto is "verifiability, not truth". Please provide verifiable evidence of this notability and reputation you speak of. Read WP:V. wikipediatrix 04:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you are aware of some definition of "verifiable" of which I am not. Everything in the article is factual and verifiable. UniversalMigrator 04:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am using Wikipedia's definition of "verifiable". Did you read WP:V or not? Are you going to provide reliable sources for your claims, or are you just going to continue asking that we take your word for everything? wikipediatrix 05:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - substantially content-free. An article that does little more than assert the existence of its subject is no use to man nor beast. BTLizard 09:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speedily if UniversalMigrator agrees as per his comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladies Of Prog Hour. --Pak21 14:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I accede to your wishes. Delete. UniversalMigrator 17:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.