Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canton Charter Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to National Heritage Academy. Not entirely sure on the redirect location but aint gonna relist to find out so I'm going with Rainbow Unicorn & redirecting it to National Heritage Academy (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canton Charter Academy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school - no indication that this passes WP:SCHOOLS, WP:CORP, WP:GNG. Previous PROD contested. Recommend redirection to either National Heritage Academy (slight preference) or Canton, Michigan#Public charter schools (2nd choice). Okay with keeping or not keeping revision history and okay with outright deletion. If there is zero discussion after a week, recommend a quick redirect-without-prejudice-to-revert to either of the above destinations rather than re-listing (this can be done by a non-admin, see WP:Non-admin closure). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable elementary school that hasn't made national news. Charlie the Pig (talk) 04:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question from the nominator for Charlie the Pig: Would you be okay with a redirect to National Heritage Academy, Canton, Michigan#Public charter schools, or either one? I ask because I will not withdraw/speedy-close unless there is a solution that all participants in this discussion, including myself, can agree on (this is what wikt:consensus means) and which does not require the use of administrative tools. So far, you nave only explicitly indicated that you are only okay with delete, Kudpong has only explicitly indicated he is okay with redirect, and I'm okay with either. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- That could also be another option. I'm fine with it. Best of wishes! Charlie the Pig (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect of course as per age-old practice and precedent as documented at WP:OUTCOMES and probably nearly 1,000 AfD closures.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any particular precedent that you know of that would sway the decision for the redirect target? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Notice: This discussion is mentioned at Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes#WP:X or Y. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for Kudpung. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 00:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And to National Heritage Academy seems good, since they operate those schools it's similar to a school district in that way. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.