Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canstar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canstar[edit]

Canstar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. A Google search showed up other companies called this plus this company's website. WP:SPA creator seems to just have created an advert. Boleyn (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (post) @ 20:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Regardless of notability, the current article is constructed exclusively out of primary sources and once they are deleted, there would be no article left. As a firm with only 60 employees, it's very unlikely to be notable. CorporateM (Talk) 05:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Promotional and not notable. DGG (at NYPL) -- reply here 20:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.