Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannabis (hashish) rosin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cannabis (hashish) rosin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think there's any such thing. Google mainly returns the WP article or copies of it. Completely unsourced conjecture doe not belong in encyclopedia. Mjpresson (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move: To Cannabis resin (which is currently a redirect) per [1]. --Odie5533 (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note Why would you merge unsourced material? Also--the link above refers to RESIN not ROSIN.Mjpresson (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note Mjpresson has removed all the content from the article, and then nominated it for speedy deletion. I have declined this request because it is bypassing this AfD process; this does not imply any view on my part as to whether the article should be kept, or in what form. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:13, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note The "all content" was one paragraph. This article has no refs, context, or even content. And R'n'B has restored unverifiable original research to an article, that, on the talk page, has been challenged since it was created. Mjpresson (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 22:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced material = original research = policy violation = delete. JBsupreme (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.