Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caner Malkarali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus Jclemens (talk) 06:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caner Malkarali[edit]

Was proded, anon removed prod with no edit summary. Non notable author. The article was created in March 2008 and still has no non trival reliable sources. Nothing found on google books [1]. A google search [2] for Caner Malkarali doesn't find reliable third party sources. Sandahl (talk) 03:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No reliable sources? What about the listed interview? Granted the current sourcing isn't stellar, but it's not non-existent. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the interview, granted I couldn't read much of it, but I can't see that an interview is enough. I see Wikipedia, Facebook, Windows live and a college website [3] as the top hits. For an author I would have expected something here. —Sandahl (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is on Google Books fully depend on what Google gets to digitize. If it's not on Google Books it doesn't neccesarily mean it doesn't exist. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google book results in Turkish brings up links but can you determine from them how relevant they are? [4] and the article also exists here [5] although totally unsourced so I found nothing there to go by .—Sandahl (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google Book Search Beta will not constitute a fully reliable source for many international authors either. If "Keskin Faik" is typed on Google, many Turkish online bookstores can be seen selling Malkarali's book along with some other interviews. 1 2 3--143.229.181.96 (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Aleta ^Sing 00:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. —Aleta ^Sing 00:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.