Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Johnson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Candice Johnson[edit]
- Candice_Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Article has no support for notability. Linked website gives no real support either. Non-notable. peterl (talk) 10:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 17:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Article might assert notibility if it were sourced/verified, but it's not. Yamakiri TC § 08-25-2008 • 20:47:56 20:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 01:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - unable to find any sources to support notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.