Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candace Glickman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss New Hampshire. Redirect is always prefferred over deletion so am closing as such (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Candace Glickman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Glickman was Miss New Hampshire and Miss New Hampshire USA, neither of which are enough on their own to make her notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 17:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We appear to have articles on multiple other Miss America and Miss USA contestants from the years Glickman participated in. Plus, per WP:ANYBIO she "received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times". Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The clear consensus is that Miss New Hampshire USA is not a "well known significant award of honor". The outcome of a whole lot of discussions has been to delete these articles. A lot fewer articles exist for 2005 winners than it appears at first, because some have been redirected.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Miss New Hampshire. My searches did not come up with anything much.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At a previous discussion on a winner of a Miss USA state award in 2005 this was pointed out "See also WP:NTEMP which says "In particular, if reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual."

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss New Hampshire as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.