Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Burn Foundation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Burn Foundation[edit]

Canadian Burn Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sparsely edited article from September 2005 and it indeed seems to have closed (I recovered the dead Gazette link here) as I have found no recent evidence of activity (aside from a 2013 book mention) and their website isn't working. My searches with the most results were this thus with a closed organization with no good coverage and overall signs of improvement, there's nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 19:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable organization, only sources are their own website and a dead link, no independent coverage, web searches turn up directories, fails WP:ORGDEPTH Kraxler (talk) 13:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.