Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada-China Agriculture and Food Development Exchange Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canada-China Agriculture and Food Development Exchange Center[edit]

Non-notable organization. I let this article stay up for a while, but I have seen no evidence of potential for improvement. A Google news search returns 0 hits with quotation marks, and only unrelated hits without. A Google web search only returns 3 hits (this article, CCAgr's own website, and a minor write-up about the guy who founded it, only giving passing mention to this organization—it's more about the guy than the org). The article itself is basically unreferenced; the only sources that are actually about the company are from the company's own website, and the rest of the sources that look good at first glance are actually just background information on China and Canada, saying nothing about the company. The article also makes no assertion about why the company is notable, and seems to just be advertising; it was created by a single-purpose account and is now being edited only by an editor with a conflict of interest. Lately it's just a vehicle for spam; the COI editor has been sticking links to it and logos all over other articles that are only tangentially related. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note This article was in the past declined from speedy deletion (diff), which I believe was appropriate, but AfD is a different matter. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Recognizance (talk) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.