Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canaan Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 14:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Canaan Online[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable browser game that fails WP:GNG for lack of secondary reliable sources that cover this in detail. This exists https://www.onrpg.com/news/canaan-online-review-too-cute-to-be-true/ but OnRPG is considered an unreliable source per WP:VG/RS. Everything in the article is primary or not in depth. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see a bunch of press releases and a handful of short articles in the WP:VGSE. This is a delete. --Izno (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The source for the award here is just a press release from the developing company, that doesn't even list who gave this "Best Browser-based MMO of 2008" award, and this award cannot be found any where on the site. Even if it was there it wouldn't pass WP:NVIDEOGAMES or WP:GNG. DeniedClub ^{❯❯❯ talk?} 08:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.