Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus Center for Appropriate Technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 08:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Campus Center for Appropriate Technology[edit]
- Campus Center for Appropriate Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established. JFW | T@lk 14:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Humboldt State University#Academics. tedder (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - a Google New search brings up hits, while a google search for the location brings up ten thousand plus. While some of these are indepth coverage, the news hits are mostly local. Therefore, it may fall under WP:LOCAL. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I am not very impressed by all the coverage in the local town paper, but I found this full-length article about the place in the Washington Post. That's rather remarkable coverage for a facility at a little-known university like Humboldt. I added that reference to the article, which still needs expansion but is no longer unreferenced. More references [1] could be added. --MelanieN (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per MelanieN; the sources she has found show this article passes WP:GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.