Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, which defaults to keep, with no prejudice against re-nomination. Arguments both to keep and delete have been advanced by Wikipedians in good standing. Given that at least two respondents have elected not to discuss the merits of the article under the circumstances of its nomination and that any future debate here will potentially be tainted by the history of the nominator, it seems most prudent to draw this debate to a close and allow it to be renominated if users believe the article fails inclusion standards. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Campbell Village Court, Oakland, California[edit]

Non-notable housing project, formatted as a neighborhood which it is not. Mini-stub. Merge any useful content with West Oakland, Oakland, California if which i see none. Icamepica (talk) 07:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per aboveIcamepica (talk) 07:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Housing projects fulfill the same function to many city apartment dwellers that neighborhoods do in the burbs. They identify with the project as where they're "from". Given that, housing projects shouldn't automatically be deleted on sight, as appears to be the case here. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 09:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Please note nominator currently has an open sockpuppet investigation against them. Nate • (chatter) 10:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close until investigation is concluded. No discrimination against renomination later. 23skidoo (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^Delete Non-notable. Izzy007 Talk 23:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close per 23skidoo. Wait for the socks to be blocked, then we can start a serious discussion. Bash Kash (talk) 03:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ed Fitzgerald and SPEEDY CLOSE. Closing nominator please take note that the nominator has been blocked for socking and disruption. (jarbarf) (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.