Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campbell Harvey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. clearly meets WP:PROF DGG ( talk ) 07:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Campbell Harvey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot establish notability via reliable independent third-party sources. All currently listed references and links are self-referential primary sources. Gotitbro (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He is a two-time Jensen Prize winner.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That prize is for the best paper published in a year in one specific journal, rather than across a discipline. I don't think that that can be used to substantiate notability. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I opened the refs and they don't support notability. He won the Jensen Prize award but it doesn't convey notability in my opinion. Szzuk (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. With a named professorship he has a clear pass of WP:PROF#C5. Additionally, RePEc lists him as #123 in the world [1]. For comparison, there are 2632 people on its list of the top 5% of all economists, so really he's among the top quarter of a percent. And with this and a Google Scholar h-index of 83 [2] including 14 publications with over 1000 citations each, he very clearly passes WP:PROF#C1. And as editor in chief of the Journal of Finance for six years, he passes #C8. A trout to Gotitbro and Szzuk for failing to follow our standards for academic notability in such a clear case. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:PROF#C1, WP:PROF#C5 and WP:PROF#C8. XOR'easter (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A clear pass of WP:Prof. A trout from me too. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.