Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign to Cut Waste
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Campaign to Cut Waste[edit]
- Campaign to Cut Waste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Generic executive order. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG, seems quite promotional to boot. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (banter) @ 22:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 20:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not exactly the B-class article the page author self-assessed it to be. Deadbeef 07:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Does not meet N or GNG, Obama signs a lot of executive orders, this one is not unique or special. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.