Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Timberlane (Canada)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Camp Timberlane (Canada)[edit]
It's not being maintained. It's a mess of an article right now; very hard to read. Somewhat of an advertisement. PROD removed by anon without explanation. -- Chris chat edits essays 11:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Húsönd 18:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Like schools, I see inherent notability in a place with real geography and attendance. Does need a clean up.Obina 19:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Summer camp with no assertation of importance of regional or greater importance. Atricle says nothing more than "We are a summer camp. We have a summer camp attendance every summer. We do summer camp things". Am also uncertain about the external verifiability of the information through the use of third party sources (i.e. something other than the camp's website and the personal recollections of the campers/counselors). -- saberwyn 21:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A summer camp joy. Hundreds of those around unless someone can show why this one is different delete the article. Whispering(talk/c) 22:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and saberwyn. The local parish church or corner Starbucks are also places with real geography and attendance, but neither place (usually) merits an article. Agent 86 22:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No assertion of notability, importance, or encyclopedic value in comparison to other summer camps. No use of independent reliable sources to make us believe that an article adhering to the core policies can be written. GRBerry 20:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.