Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Lazlo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep as even the nominator wanted it kept and cleaned up and all the subsequent votes were to keep. Capitalistroadster 09:40, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Lazlo[edit]

This is a bit of a strange one for AfD, but who knows where else to put it? This article starts off well enough, but then turns into a list of the episodes of this show, with each one on its way to being created. So, is that a good idea? But worse follows with a section on "Episode ideas", again with each one in the process of being created. This is Not Good. I guess I'm saying Keep the main article but Delete the listcruft and fancruft surrounding it. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 01:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An example from the article... Episode Ideas For All Guys Who Wants To Keep Camp Lazlo Alive For Many Years. If You Agree With Me Send More Episode Ideas/Synopsis! Note: There has been several deletions on this page, and please DO NOT DELETE THIS PAGE. This only a page for episode ideas. Moral:"You Can Smash Machines, But You Can't Smash Ideas." By Frederick Douglass. Movie Midnight / The Electric Blight Orchestra... and so on. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 01:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well known animated show, I don't personally watch it, but it is in the main lineup on CArtoon Network. If it needs cleanup, then either add the tag or do it. As for the episodes, I was gonna suggest tagging them for merging, similar to the Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes lists. «»Who ?¿?^meta 01:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AfD is not the place to suggest a cleanup or improvement of an article, there are various templates for that. The animated series itself is listed in IMDB and is certainly notable enough. -- Curps 01:31, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Real animated series. The crap the nominator was complaining about has since been removed. Saberwyn 01:44, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Speedy Keep per new, shiny Wikipedia:Speedy keep guideline, second bullet point, as nominator had no intention of completely deleting the article Saberwyn 05:36, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article should have been listed on cleanup with the nomination appearing on the article's talk page. Thanks to whoever removed the original research. Capitalistroadster 01:50, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Any need for article cleanup is irrelevant to the notability of the subject itself. *Dan T.* 02:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if you think the main article should be kept you shouldn't have nominated it for deletion, just edited it or started a discussion on the talk page. --TheMidnighters 03:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously notable animated series. Carioca 03:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all that is needed is a bit of cleaning up. --JB Adder | [[User talk:Jb-adder|Talk]] 04:00, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: You may wish to open an RfC on the content of the article, as that would be an appropriate way of establishing consensus for and against certain directions that the authors want to go. Geogre 16:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.