Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Caribou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Caribou[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see evidence of notability here. One source is an advertorial, one the camp's website, one (NYT) a decent source, and one a trivial mention. A BEFORE search doesn't find anything other than trivial coverage. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find this in the Financial Times too, [1]. I think it's at GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Describing the New York Times coverage as a "decent source" is an extreme understatement. It is an outstanding source without a doubt. This place is 101 years old and it seems almost certain that there is much more coverage that cannot be easily found. I found coverage in a book called The Moosehead Lake Region: 1900-1950. Cullen328 (talk) 07:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above. Long-lived/historic summer camps are going to be notable, along lines of wp:ITSAPUBLICATTRACTION, an essay to which I contributed. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 01:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.